Substituting “The Right” for “a right”

Substituting “The Right” for “a right”

 A breaking news of New York Times: “WASHINGTON — In a long-sought victory for the gay rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote on Friday that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage.”

Thus the marriage which was held in high honor right from the origin of humanity (marriage is honorable in all) has become dishonorable. The Supreme Court decision would destroy the very foundation of the first institution. This would shatter the very design and purpose of creation. God created one male and one female and commanded them to be fruitful. Here, then, we have a clear statement of the divine purpose of marriage: both positively, it is for the procreation of children; and negatively, it is a rejection of the ancient oriental fertility cults. God desires his people to be fruitful. This decision of the Supreme Court now challenges God the creator who created man and woman with two different physical, emotional and mental structures. When we give room for the philosophy of relativism, we will also have to substitute “the right” for “a right.”

Dr T.S.Abraham

 

Write to us @ persecutionrelief.org